The tried and tested alternatives such as Design

procurement route selected will be dependent upon a number of factors and will
be influenced by the nature and size of the project. For this particular
project the most appropriate route would be that of Management Procurement (Management
Contracting) due a number of favourable advantages this method has over
alternatives. One of the primary reasons for selecting this route is due to the
favourable solution it offers towards complex and specialist projects. Due to
the development being a grade 2 listed building, with structural problems it
can be said that this particular method would be the most suitable and
appropriate. In addition to this the route will also offer a degree of design
flexibility meaning changes can be made throughout the construction process.
For this development design flexibility may be required due to the structural
state of the building. Due to the problems it has a flexible approach may be
needed and adaptions applied throughout the process as more issues are uncovered.
The majority of construction development work is highly focused around the
commercial aspect, therefore applying a certain degree of importance upon the
cost management of the project. Management Procurement will allow for a
potential cost saving due to the competitive tender process it implies,
alternative methods do not practice this method and can therefore be more price
inefficient. In addition to the cost aspect, this method will also allow for a
quality build. This is because each package is subcontracted to a specialist contractor
ensuing a quality finish due to each subcontractor’s expertise within the
field. Other tried and tested alternatives such as Design & Build would not
be suitable on a complex development as the route does not suit highly complex
projects and refurbishment schemes.

selecting contractors to be included on the tender list a pre-qualification
questionnaire (PQQ) will be required. This particular piece of documentation
sets out a series of questions to the potential contractors, with the aim of
identifying the most appropriate contractors for the project. The responses to the
PQQ will allow the client to evaluate and select the most suitable contactors
to be included on the tender list. The information which is requested will need
to be relevant and appropriate to the project and also the size of the
contract. In reality the factors which should be considered can vary greatly, however
in this situation the most appropriate factors are analysed below.

First of
all, arguably one of the most important factors is the financial standing of
the contractor. Up to date company accounts and current financial stability
will be required and then vetted by the client and their professional advisors.
This is necessary as a poor financial status will suggest the contractor would
not be suitable for the project or package. A sound financial background will
offer security to the client regarding the contractor’s history and ability the
complete the package in question. Without this financial check in place there
is a risk that the contractor may run into financial difficulty during the
project which could negatively impact the project in a number of ways. For
example, the cost, programme and quality could potentially be negatively
implicated due to a poor financial record.

important factor would be the experience and skill set of the contractor. Upon
selecting a contractor for a particular package previous work completed by the
contractor should be inspected to assess the standard of the workmanship. When
selecting a contractor, it is often good practice to engage one with previous
work experience on a project of a similar size and complexity. Additionally, it
would be good practice for the client to request references from previous
customers where similar work has been completed. This way the client can have
faith and confidence in the workmanship which is going to be carried out, as
oppose to a contractor who may be new and inexperienced. An inexperienced
contractor would apply uncertainly to the project due to their lack of track
record. Whether this be down the age of the contractor or the work previously
completed it would be advised to select a respected experienced contractor for
all packages. Appointing an unexperienced contractor may be cost advantageous
initially, however in the long run this may be revered due to their
incapability’s. Any mistakes or errors made could lead to a financial
implication to the project and therefore should be avoided and reduced where

the client should request and evaluate the Health, Safety, Quality and
Environmental (HSQE) performance of proposed contractors. All employers have a
duty of care project their employees and others from harm potentially arising
from work related activities as stated in the Health and Safety at Work Act
1974. Information requested can include but would not be limited to the likes
of RIDDOR reports, HSQE audits and management systems EG ISO 9000. In the
construction industry HSQE is of paramount importance and it is common practice
that when contractors are included on tender lists they are required to submit
their H policy and procedures. By doing this it will offer the client
assurances in regards to how the contractor operates and conducts their work.
If a contractor produces an inadequate H policy then it would be advised
that they are not to be included on the tender list due to the potential risk
which they may incur to the project. H accidents which occur on
construction projects often incur a cost implication and therefore any risk
should be mitigated.